The Multiple Myeloma

Extramedullary Manifestations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59667/sjoranm.v6i1.14

Keywords:

multiple myeloma, extramedullary manifestations, testicular blood barrier

Abstract

The second most common hematologic malignancy is the clonal proliferation of neoplastic plasma cells within the bone marrow. There is the presence of monoclonal immunoglobulins in the serum and/or urine. This results in anemia, myelosuppression, bone destruction, and clinical consequences of para-proteinemia on kidney function and other organ systems. The disease manifests through the acronym CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal impairment, anemia, and bone lesions). Less frequent manifestations of multiple myeloma are of extramedullary localizations. Myeloma cells can become independent of the bone marrow microenvironment, circulate freely in the blood, and infiltrate organs. This results in a high-risk state characterized by increased proliferation, evasion of apoptosis, and treatment resistance. It can affect any area of tissue. Most commonly it involves the pleura, lymph nodes, chest wall, liver, skin/soft tissue, lungs, CNS, genitourinary system, breast and pancreas. In patients with confirmed multiple myeloma, the diagnosis of extramedullary involvement is typically established by the presence of pathological soft tissue masses using radiological methods such as computed tomography (CT) scan, positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ultrasound, along with biopsy or physical examination. The molecular mechanisms underlying the development of extramedullary multiple myeloma (EMM) have not been fully defined. Various cytogenetic abnormalities are observed, and some studies have generated genomic sequencing profiles that distinguish EMM from classic multiple myeloma. While plasma cell leukemia (PCL) and central nervous system (CNS) EMM indicate a poor prognosis, outcomes for other manifestations can be highly heterogeneous. Sensitive imaging modalities including PET/CT and MRI (Fig.1) are integral components of diagnosis and response assessment. Patients with extramedullary multiple myeloma (EMM) have a clear survival disadvantage.

References

Catto MB, Safranauskas R, Datoguia TS, et al.

Cytogenetic findings in testicular relapse of

multiple myeloma: case report and literature

review. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther 2024. DOI:

0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . h t c t . 2 0 2 3 . 1 2 . 0 0 2 . h t t p s : / /

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38402033 https://

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/

S2531137924000063?via%3Dihub

Strauss D, Sachpekidis C, Dapunt U, Gold

schmidt H, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Unusual

Extramedullary Manifestation in Multiple

Myeloma: Bilateral Synchronous Testicular Infiltra-

tion. Clin Nucl Med 2023;48(2):e76-e77. DOI:

1097/RLU.0000000000004496. https://

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36399719

Doshi K, Abedrabo S, Bitran J, Asado N. A Case

of Recurrent Multiple Myeloma as Testicular

Plasmacytoma Without Systemic Disease. Cureus

;15(6):e40785. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40785.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37485101

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/

P M C 1 0 3 6 2 5 2 7 / p d f /

cureus-0015-00000040785.pdf

Mohan M, Yarlagadda N, Szabo A, Singh A, Pina

Oviedo S, Schinke C. Clinical characteristics of

testicular extramedullary involvement in multiple

myeloma. Am J Hematol 2021;96(3):E77-E81.

D O I : 1 0 . 1 0 0 2 / a j h . 2 6 0 7 2 . h t t p s : / /

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338289

Bhutani M, Foureau DM, Atrash S, Voorhees PM,

Usmani SZ. Extramedullary multiple myeloma.

L e u k e m i a 2 0 2 0 ; 3 4 ( 1 ) : 1 - 2 0 . ( h t t p s : / /

www.nature.com/articles/s41375-019-0660-0).

Yamashita K, Horiuchi T, Hayashida A, Tachibana

H, Toki D, Kondo T. Multiple myeloma with

testicular involvement: a case report. Urology

Case Reports 2019;26:100971. (https://

w w w. n c b i . n l m . n i h . g o v / p m c / a r t i c l e s /

PMC6659131/pdf/main.pdf).

Sevcikova S, Minarik J, Stork M, Jelinek T, Pour L,

Hajek R. Extramedullary disease in multiple

myeloma–controversies and future directions.

Blood reviews 2019;36:32-39. (https://

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/

S0268960X18300961?via%3Dihub).

Ormond Filho AG, Carneiro BC, Pastore D, et al.

Whole-body imaging of multiple myeloma:

diagnostic criteria. Radiographics 2019;39(4):

-1097. (https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/

rg . 2 0 1 9 1 8 0 0 9 6 ? u r l _ v e r = Z 3 9 . 8 8 - 2 0 0 3 -

&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%

pubmed).

Rajkumar SV. Updated diagnostic criteria and

staging system for multiple myeloma. American

Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book

;36:e418-e423.

Pasmantier MW, Azar HA. Extraskeletal spread in

multiple plasma cell myeloma: A review of 57

autopsied cases. Cancer 1969;23(1):167-174.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

The Multiple Myeloma: Extramedullary Manifestations. (2024). Swiss Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.59667/sjoranm.v6i1.14

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>